First of all, let me just say that the events of yesterday and the latest news from United States Attorney General Loretta Lynch today do not surprise me IN THE LEAST, and I trust it did not surprise any of you, either. What we have seen have seen is one of the grossest miscarriages of justice in all of United States history! But again, this news did not surprise me, surely did not surprise any other reasonably intelligent person in the United States, and will (I predict) have no effect whatever on the coming presidential election in November.
Second, just a minor point. Loretta Lynch proved early on that she was just an Obama "yes man" by her lack of handling of any obviously criminal matters dating all the way back to possible action against Former AG Holder and "Operation Fast and Furious." Then, just before no less than the DIRECTOR of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) PERSONALLY made the announcement that no charges would be pursued against Hillary Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch met with former president William (Slick Willie) Clinton on an airplane in midflight. It suggests that the participants wanted no one on the ground to know the agenda up for discussion. So, AG Lynch meets with Slick Sick Bill, then, just one day after Director James Comey declares that the FBI was through with this matter, Ms. Lynch announces that she will follow the FBI's (Comey's) recommendation (Bill Clinton's as well????) and will not pursue any further criminal action against the Democratic presidential candidate. So Miss Loretta continues her role as Obama's official "yes man."
So FBI Director James Comey declares that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong "legally," she was just "careless" about how she handled information related to matters of national security. Further, Ms. Clinton had no "intent." The good Director did not mention exactly what kind of "intent" that he determined Ms. Clinton did not have. I mean was it "criminal intent" she did not have? The word "criminal" was only used once, when Director Comey said no "criminal charges" would be pursued. But he did at least "chide" the innocent of intent Clinton for being "careless" with information that was actually a matter of national security. Some of this information was in fact "top secret."
I wonder what sort of criteria Director Comey might have used to decide that Hillary Clinton had no "intent." For instance, Ms. Hillary said she did not handle any information that was "classified" as top secret "at the time" that she sent and received this information over an unsecured (and UNREPORTED) private server. Actually, according to Clinton's champion, Director Comey, there were at least THIRTY TOP SECRET pieces of information, and many more that were at least "classified." In other words, Hillary Clinton LIED to the FBI when she said she handled NO top secret information on her private server. Isn't lying to investigators sort of an indication of "intent?"
But Hillary Clinton went on to delete (or ORDER to be deleted - uhh...isn't this now a conspiracy?) over THIRTY THOUSAND separate emails, many of which the FBI's computer forensics experts were not able (?) to recover upon searching her computer equipment. I think (of course I am not an attorney, like Hillary is) that this action ALSO is at least a hint of (dare I say it?) "intent," and intent of the "criminal" kind. But what do I know? After all, Director Comey said Ms. Hillary had no "intent." She was, according to him, simply CARELESS.
An aside here - Years ago President Richard Nixon was forced to resign the presidency because he deleted 18 minutes of incriminating conversation that was NOT related to national security, but only to the failed mission of the Watergate Hotel "plumbers." How many HOURS worth of information regarding Hillary Clinton's culpability for direct NATIONAL SECURITY BREACHES was deleted in those 30,000 emails? Yet this woman is STILL A CANDIDATE FOR THIS NATION'S HIGHEST OFFICE!!!
So Hillary obstructed an investigation, lied to investigators, and broke all kinds of state department protocols regarding handling TOP SECRET information on unprotected, un-vetted, and certainly unauthorized computer equipment. But she will not be charged because, as she insisted over and over, she "did nothing wrong." But just a few months ago, Hillary Clinton herself was yelling for the head of a young American government contractor named Edward Snowden. And what was she yelling? She was SCREAMING that this man, who should have been protected as a "whistleblower," be prosecuted...for what? He should be prosecuted for his "CARELESS HANDLING OF TOP SECRET INFORMATION THAT RELATES DIRECTLY TO NATIONAL SECURITY!!"
No, I am not making up any of this. All of what I have written can easily be "fact checked" via multiple sources both on the Internet and in print media. Hillary Clinton, the "pot" in this case has invested at least a year in decrying Snowden's (the kettle's) actions. Now we know that Hillary was herself engaged in misusing secret government information, and not with the intent of warning the United States, and yes, the WORLD, that the NSA and various other alphabet agencies were busily engaged in actively spying on both United States citizens and citizens of other nations as they communicated with US citizens. No, I am not sure WHAT Hillary's intent was (is) with her misuse of top secret information, but I am certain it was not to alert law-abiding citizens that their government was ILLEGALLY spying on them.
Hillary Clinton wants Edward Snowden to be prosecuted for his "crime" of revealing to US - you and me - and to various nations around the world that the United States government was engaged mass, world-wide espionage - not against known criminals, international gun-smugglers, dope cartels, terrorists, but against YOU and ME. After all, the American elites have much more to fear from honest citizens than against those elements listed above.
BUT -
Hillary Clinton does NOT believe she did anything wrong in her misuse of top secret information, transmitting this information via unsecure electronic media, lying to investigators about it, and attempting to cover the full extent of her actions by deleting 30,000 (that she admitted to) emails. Not only did she do "nothing wrong," but she now calls on you and I to just "move on" and "put this email thing" behind us. Come to think of it, I believe she said the same thing about Benghazi. I believe she said we need to just "move on." Never mind the American dead there. In fact, never mind the trail of the dead that doggedly follows the Clintons across America. Just "move on," just "put this behind us" and get busy and elect her as the next president!
Note to Director Comey: While no person can be COMPELLED to talk to FBI agents, a person who voluntarily participates in an official FBI interview, and LIES in that interview, is guilty of a federal crime, whether that person is charged with, or even SUSPECTED of another crime. You can, Director Comey, prosecute Ms. Clinton for the listed crime of "Lying to Federal Agents During an Investigation." Ah, but Ms. Clinton had no "intent," did she, Director Comey? Isn't that what you told us.
Yes, the Pot called the Kettle "black" (dirty) even as the Pot was SMOTHERED with dirt of the worst kind! Yet this Pot, Hillary Clinton, will NO DOUBT be the Democratic nominee by the time their national convention is over. Electors are salivating ALL OVER THEMSELVES to get this woman into the White House. Very likely this will happen, regardless of the outcome of the popular election. The delegates are all but set.
My friends, what we have seen here is one of the greatest travesties of the United States criminal (IN)justice system of all time. Not an example of "White Privilege" but of "Elite Privilege." No person who wants his or her job in the current administration would DARE tell President Obama that Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted. And Obama himself is now stumping for Hillary. Obviously HE does not believe she did anything "wrong." As far as the "underlings" who carried out the "email" investigation, many of them have families, job security, and good retirement plans, which they have no desire to endanger by going forward with the Clinton prosecution. Plus, there is quite the possibility that the trail of the "dead" that doggedly follows both the Clintons might lead to their own door steps. Certainly their careers would take a sudden and very deep dive to the south.
Yes, the Pot called the Kettle black, and the United States criminal (IN)justice system prattles on...
May God Bless (and save) America
Second, just a minor point. Loretta Lynch proved early on that she was just an Obama "yes man" by her lack of handling of any obviously criminal matters dating all the way back to possible action against Former AG Holder and "Operation Fast and Furious." Then, just before no less than the DIRECTOR of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) PERSONALLY made the announcement that no charges would be pursued against Hillary Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch met with former president William (Slick Willie) Clinton on an airplane in midflight. It suggests that the participants wanted no one on the ground to know the agenda up for discussion. So, AG Lynch meets with Slick Sick Bill, then, just one day after Director James Comey declares that the FBI was through with this matter, Ms. Lynch announces that she will follow the FBI's (Comey's) recommendation (Bill Clinton's as well????) and will not pursue any further criminal action against the Democratic presidential candidate. So Miss Loretta continues her role as Obama's official "yes man."
So FBI Director James Comey declares that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong "legally," she was just "careless" about how she handled information related to matters of national security. Further, Ms. Clinton had no "intent." The good Director did not mention exactly what kind of "intent" that he determined Ms. Clinton did not have. I mean was it "criminal intent" she did not have? The word "criminal" was only used once, when Director Comey said no "criminal charges" would be pursued. But he did at least "chide" the innocent of intent Clinton for being "careless" with information that was actually a matter of national security. Some of this information was in fact "top secret."
I wonder what sort of criteria Director Comey might have used to decide that Hillary Clinton had no "intent." For instance, Ms. Hillary said she did not handle any information that was "classified" as top secret "at the time" that she sent and received this information over an unsecured (and UNREPORTED) private server. Actually, according to Clinton's champion, Director Comey, there were at least THIRTY TOP SECRET pieces of information, and many more that were at least "classified." In other words, Hillary Clinton LIED to the FBI when she said she handled NO top secret information on her private server. Isn't lying to investigators sort of an indication of "intent?"
But Hillary Clinton went on to delete (or ORDER to be deleted - uhh...isn't this now a conspiracy?) over THIRTY THOUSAND separate emails, many of which the FBI's computer forensics experts were not able (?) to recover upon searching her computer equipment. I think (of course I am not an attorney, like Hillary is) that this action ALSO is at least a hint of (dare I say it?) "intent," and intent of the "criminal" kind. But what do I know? After all, Director Comey said Ms. Hillary had no "intent." She was, according to him, simply CARELESS.
An aside here - Years ago President Richard Nixon was forced to resign the presidency because he deleted 18 minutes of incriminating conversation that was NOT related to national security, but only to the failed mission of the Watergate Hotel "plumbers." How many HOURS worth of information regarding Hillary Clinton's culpability for direct NATIONAL SECURITY BREACHES was deleted in those 30,000 emails? Yet this woman is STILL A CANDIDATE FOR THIS NATION'S HIGHEST OFFICE!!!
So Hillary obstructed an investigation, lied to investigators, and broke all kinds of state department protocols regarding handling TOP SECRET information on unprotected, un-vetted, and certainly unauthorized computer equipment. But she will not be charged because, as she insisted over and over, she "did nothing wrong." But just a few months ago, Hillary Clinton herself was yelling for the head of a young American government contractor named Edward Snowden. And what was she yelling? She was SCREAMING that this man, who should have been protected as a "whistleblower," be prosecuted...for what? He should be prosecuted for his "CARELESS HANDLING OF TOP SECRET INFORMATION THAT RELATES DIRECTLY TO NATIONAL SECURITY!!"
No, I am not making up any of this. All of what I have written can easily be "fact checked" via multiple sources both on the Internet and in print media. Hillary Clinton, the "pot" in this case has invested at least a year in decrying Snowden's (the kettle's) actions. Now we know that Hillary was herself engaged in misusing secret government information, and not with the intent of warning the United States, and yes, the WORLD, that the NSA and various other alphabet agencies were busily engaged in actively spying on both United States citizens and citizens of other nations as they communicated with US citizens. No, I am not sure WHAT Hillary's intent was (is) with her misuse of top secret information, but I am certain it was not to alert law-abiding citizens that their government was ILLEGALLY spying on them.
Hillary Clinton wants Edward Snowden to be prosecuted for his "crime" of revealing to US - you and me - and to various nations around the world that the United States government was engaged mass, world-wide espionage - not against known criminals, international gun-smugglers, dope cartels, terrorists, but against YOU and ME. After all, the American elites have much more to fear from honest citizens than against those elements listed above.
BUT -
Hillary Clinton does NOT believe she did anything wrong in her misuse of top secret information, transmitting this information via unsecure electronic media, lying to investigators about it, and attempting to cover the full extent of her actions by deleting 30,000 (that she admitted to) emails. Not only did she do "nothing wrong," but she now calls on you and I to just "move on" and "put this email thing" behind us. Come to think of it, I believe she said the same thing about Benghazi. I believe she said we need to just "move on." Never mind the American dead there. In fact, never mind the trail of the dead that doggedly follows the Clintons across America. Just "move on," just "put this behind us" and get busy and elect her as the next president!
Note to Director Comey: While no person can be COMPELLED to talk to FBI agents, a person who voluntarily participates in an official FBI interview, and LIES in that interview, is guilty of a federal crime, whether that person is charged with, or even SUSPECTED of another crime. You can, Director Comey, prosecute Ms. Clinton for the listed crime of "Lying to Federal Agents During an Investigation." Ah, but Ms. Clinton had no "intent," did she, Director Comey? Isn't that what you told us.
Yes, the Pot called the Kettle "black" (dirty) even as the Pot was SMOTHERED with dirt of the worst kind! Yet this Pot, Hillary Clinton, will NO DOUBT be the Democratic nominee by the time their national convention is over. Electors are salivating ALL OVER THEMSELVES to get this woman into the White House. Very likely this will happen, regardless of the outcome of the popular election. The delegates are all but set.
My friends, what we have seen here is one of the greatest travesties of the United States criminal (IN)justice system of all time. Not an example of "White Privilege" but of "Elite Privilege." No person who wants his or her job in the current administration would DARE tell President Obama that Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted. And Obama himself is now stumping for Hillary. Obviously HE does not believe she did anything "wrong." As far as the "underlings" who carried out the "email" investigation, many of them have families, job security, and good retirement plans, which they have no desire to endanger by going forward with the Clinton prosecution. Plus, there is quite the possibility that the trail of the "dead" that doggedly follows both the Clintons might lead to their own door steps. Certainly their careers would take a sudden and very deep dive to the south.
Yes, the Pot called the Kettle black, and the United States criminal (IN)justice system prattles on...
May God Bless (and save) America
No comments:
Post a Comment